Making technology user (and data protection) friendly

04 october 2019

New technologies are often a source of wonder, but they can also be a source of concern. There are many reasons for this, one being the lack of transparency in certain modern processing operations, which could provoke confusion, and even suspicion, among data protection and cybersecurity experts and non-experts alike.

It is for this reason that it is so important to clarify from the very start of a new technology’s lifecycle the terms and conditions of any data processing, especially those that involve innovative technologies that many people might not be familiar with or easily understand. It is up to the controller - those who are responsible for determining how the data is processed and for what purpose - to determine that the proposed data processing operations are fair and transparent and to clearly explain them to users.  

Not only do controllers have a legal obligation under both the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the equivalent rules for the EU institutions, to provide this information, but it is in their interest to do so, in order to maintain and build consumer trust. If controllers do not explain how technologies work, as well as their personal data processing operations, they may lose this trust. The information that controllers are legally obliged to provide includes the name of the controller in the data processing, for which purposes data is processed, to whom personal data may be transmitted and for how long data will be stored. Individuals must also be informed about their rights in relation to the data processed.

All of this information needs to be communicated in a concise, transparent, intelligible and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language. This becomes even more important when communicating with minors. The information should be provided in writing, usually in the form of a data protection notice, available either online or on paper. If requested by an individual, it can also be provided orally.

 

Retrieved from https://edps.europa.eu

News archive

 

Firm news

lug20

20/07/2026

Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile

Modalità di reclamo per negato imbarco, cancellazione e ritardo prolungato del volo In caso di di negato imbarco, cancellazione del volo o ritardo prolungato

lug20

20/07/2026

Autorita' di regolazione dei trasporti

ART per la tutela dei diritti ART, in qualità di regolatore indipendente, definisce anche il contenuto minimo dei diritti degli utenti nei confronti dei gestori dei servizi e delle

lug20

20/07/2026

Sentenza della Corte nella causa C-421/24 | AGCOM (Gioco d’azzardo online)

Per la Corte di Giustizia dell'Ue, la  Piattaforme multimediali Google può essere ritenuta responsabile per i video YouTube di un creatore di contenuti vincolato da una partnership commerciale. Il

Lawyer News

lug20

20/07/2026

Nel CCNL Studi professionali la formazione diventa welfare

<p><span>Il CCNL con il supporto

lug20

20/07/2026

L’avvocato non è mai in pausa: la toga senza scrivania

Per l'iscrizione e la permanenza nell’albo

lug20

20/07/2026

Confisca transnazionale: il punto della Corte costituzionale

<p>Nel dichiarare inammissibili una