Antitrust:ICA: penalty of 2,875,000 euros to Enegan for billing electricity and gas charges not due by users

30 giugno 2020

The Authority has concluded the proceedings filed against Enegan, by ascertaining the adoption by the abovementioned company of an incorrect practice in the context of the supply of electric power and gas services, consisting both in the billing of various cost items and cancellation penalties not payable by users, and the omission of relevant and transparent information about the nature of these charges.

In particular, in the event of a contractual withdrawal, Enegan charged the users with charges by way of recovery of the activation costs which represented, conversely, penalties for leaving the contract, which the Company only reversed on bills following repeated customer complaints.

The company also proceeded to bill users with further charges that were determined incorrectly (administrative charges), or not provided for in the contracts signed (equalising charges), or in contrast with the regulations in force (postal charges).

In other cases, Enegan unilaterally changed the economic terms and conditions of the contracts, without sending a prior notice, thus preventing its customers from withdrawal from the supply contract without charge, in case of non-acceptance of the economic changes.

The issuing of invoices inclusive of such incorrect charges generated a great number of complaints from users that Enegan considered to be well founded in most cases. In fact, in accepting the complaints, it acknowledged that the disputed charges were "not due" and caused by dysfunctions or anomalies in the billing system, up to proceed with the related reversal.

However, before the end of proceedings Enegan took important measures in favour of consumersaimed at changing its billing policy, in particular by eliminating the clauses which, in the event of users’s withdrawal, allowed the Company to bill additional charges (penalties) or revoke any discounts and benefits granted to the customer during the contractual phase.

In consideration of the seriousness of the conduct, the Authority imposed a fine of 2,875,000 euros on Enegan.

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

lug20

20/07/2026

Sentenza della Corte nella causa C-421/24 | AGCOM (Gioco d’azzardo online)

er la Corte di Giustizia dell'Ue, la  Piattaforme multimediali Google può essere ritenuta responsabile per i video YouTube di un creatore di contenuti vincolato da una partnership

lug20

20/07/2026

Sintesi della consultazione pubblica indetta con la delibera n. 59/26/CONS concernente l’impiego di frequenze nella banda 40,5-43,5 GHz per sistemi terrestri in grado di fornire servizi di comunicazione elettronica a banda larga wireless ai sensi della de

Il documento riporta una sintesi delle posizioni espresse e delle informazioni fornite dai rispondenti alla consultazione pubblica di cui alla delibera n. 59/26/CONS concernente l’impiego

lug20

20/07/2026

NIS2: Organi di amministrazione e direttivi

L'Agenzia per la Cybersicurezza Nazionale ha aggiornato le FAQ relative agli obblighi degli organi di amministrazione e direttivi dei soggetti NIS, integrando le FAQ ODA.8 e ODA.9 e introducendo

News Giuridiche

lug20

20/07/2026

L’avvocato non è mai in pausa: la toga senza scrivania

Per l'iscrizione e la permanenza nell’albo

lug20

20/07/2026

Esame avvocato e pratica forense: le nuove disposizioni

<p>Con il <a href="https://onelegale.wolterskluwer.it/document/10LX0001006304SOMM"

lug20

20/07/2026

Nel CCNL Studi professionali la formazione diventa welfare

<p><span>Il CCNL con il supporto