Self-driving cars: the role of e-call services

19 gennaio 2017

By Fabrizio Cugia di Sant’Orsola

Following the information spilled out during the latest Silicon Valley rounds of Sergio Marchionne (FCA CEO) apparently one of the strategic issues lagging behind the arrangements between FCA and Over the Top players (such as Apple and Google) with respect to the development of an intelligent self-driving cars is the delivery of emergency calls (e-calls) and potentially related infotainment services, deliverable by means of the same SIM cards.

Italian and European regulation envisages the obligation of car manufacturers to ensure e-call services within 2018 following the decision by the EU Parliament of April 2015 to adopt a single centralized emergency EU number (112) reachable from any motorway in any Member State.

Under such resolution, the SIM cards embedded in the vehicle will need to comunicate the vehicle's exact location to emergency services (sensitive data), the time of incident and the direction of travel (most important on motorways), even if the driver is unconscious or unable to make such phone call. Also, an eCall will also need to be triggered manually by pushing a button in the car, for example by a witness of a serious accident.

Aside conjectures, the fundamental topic will be the property of SIM cards and relevant provision of electronic communication services in the sale of “connected vehicles”.

Car manufacturers such as FCA are in fact shifting their value propositions, identifying a critical role in retaining the property of data processed by embedded SIM cards, and acting also possibly as operators in offering relevant infotainment services. In this event car manufacturers will be subject to the electronic communications applicable regulatory regime, particularly in terms of obligation of identification of users, data retention and communication security obligations. Hence, the manufacturer shall i) be duly authorised to provide mobile electronic communication services and ii) comply with all applicable privacy regulations for the gathering, retention and security of geo-localization (sensitive) data related to the eCall Service offered in vehicles.

Under Article 55, para. 7, of the Italian Communication Code, dealers acting as authorized telecoms operators must identify end users upon delivery of the SIM card and prior to its activation or any provision of connectivity services. Under the applicable Italian discipline, the collection of data concerning end users of telecoms services (including identity details) is an obligation imposed on authorized telecoms operators, responsible for the offering of related services.

The eventual transfer of title to the vehicle also will necessarily imply the transfer of title to the SIM card and fulfillment of the requirement for all end users of regulated telecoms services to be uniquely identified.

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

mag29

29/05/2024

Protecting journalists and promoting media freedom: New rules enter into force

Independent, fact-based journalism helps protect our democracies by exposing injustices, holding leaders to account and allowing citizens to make informed decisions. Journalists, who sometimes

mag29

29/05/2024

The general authorisation and related frameworks for international submarine connectivity

Investment in and the modernisation of submarine telecommunications cables is essential to ensure connectivity across Europe and other continents. In order to reduce the costs associated with such investments,

mag29

29/05/2024

Facial recognition at airports: individuals should have maximum control over biometric data

During its latest plenary, the EDPB adopted an Opinion on the use of facial recognition technologies by airport operators and airline companies to streamline the passenger flow at airports*. This

News Giuridiche

giu1

01/06/2024

Detenzione carceraria o domiciliare: l’importanza della salute mentale del condannato

Il quadro normativo e gli sviluppi giurisprudenziali

mag31

31/05/2024

Sul rigetto di decreto penale di condanna e successiva archiviazione

Il GIP non può decidere sull'opposizione