Data processing at work

28 giugno 2017

On June 8, 2017, Article 29 Working Party (“WP29”) adopted the new opinion 2/2017 on data processing at work, which makes a new assessment of the balance between legitimate interests of employers and the reasonable privacy expectations of employees by outlining the risks posed by new technologies and undertaking a proportionality assessment of a number of scenarios in which they could be deployed.

 WP29 conducted its analysis taking account the  current legal framework under Directive 95/46/EC (the Data Protection Directive or “DPD”) and the new Regulation 2016/679 (the General Data Protection Regulation or “GDPR”), which has already entered into force and which will become applicable on 25 May 2018. With regard to the proposed ePrivacy Regulation5, the Working Party calls on European legislators to create a specific exception for interference with devices issued to employees (WP29, Opinion 01/2017 on the Proposed Regulation for the ePrivacy Regulation, WP 247, 04 April 2017).

 Under the legal grounds analyzed,  WP29 pointed out that employers must  take note of the following:

- for the majority of such data processing at work, the legal basis cannot and should not be the consent of the employees (Art 7(a)) due to the nature of the relationship between employer and employee;

- ? processing may be necessary for the performance of a contract (Art 7(b)) in cases where the employer has to process personal data of the employee to meet any such obligations;

- it is quite common that employment law may impose legal obligations (Art. 7(c)) that necessitate the processing of personal data; in such cases the employee must be clearly and fully informed of such processing (unless an exception applies);

- should an employer seek to rely on legitimate interest (Art. 7(f)) the purpose of the processing must be legitimate; the chosen method or specific technology must be necessary, proportionate and implemented in the least intrusive manner possible along with the ability to enable the employer to demonstrate that appropriate measures have been put in place to ensure a balance with the fundamental rights and freedoms of employees;

- the processing operations must also comply with the transparency requirements (Art. 10 and 11), and employees should be clearly and fully informed of the processing of their personal data10, including the existence of any monitoring; and

- appropriate technical and organizational measures should be adopted to ensure security of the processing (Art. 17).

 WP29 highlighted the importance to guarantee transparency referring to the processing of personal data by means of  monitoring technologies.

In addition, WP29 pointed out that data processing at work must be a proportionate response to the risks faced by an employer. The information registered from the ongoing monitoring, as well as the information that is shown to the employer, should be minimized as much as possible. Employees should have the possibility to temporarily shut off location tracking, if justified by the circumstances. 

Finally, WP29 provided an analysis related to the obligations introduced by “GDPR”, for all data controllers, including employers, which also include requirements such as data protection by design and data protection impact assessment.

 

Avv. Silvia Giampaolo

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

mar4

04/03/2026

Misura Internet mobile: disponibile online il report della Campagna 2025 sulla velocità delle reti mobili in 45 città

L' Agcom ha pubblicato lo studio sulla Misura Internet Mobile.   La velocità media in download dei servizi di connessione ad Internet da rete mobile, per le misure statiche, risulta di

mar3

03/03/2026

Proposta di Regolamento Europeo “Digital Ominibus”

Il 19 novembre 2025, la Commissione Europea ha presentato la proposta di Regolamento Europeo  che modifica i regolamenti (UE) 2016/679, (UE) 2018/1724, (UE) 2018/1725 e (UE) 2023/2854 e le

mar3

03/03/2026

Legge di Bilancio e Agcom

L’art. 1 comma 273 della L. Legge 30/12/2025, n. 199, Bilancio di previsione dello Stato per l'anno finanziario 2026 e bilancio pluriennale per il triennio 2026-2028 ha in modo incontrovertibile

News Giuridiche

mar9

09/03/2026

Minaccia droni, uno scudo europeo per i cieli: l’Action Plan UE

Una strategia integrata tra sicurezza civile

mar9

09/03/2026

I ''vincoli fantasma'' nei pignoramenti presso terzi e l’art. 551-bis c.p.c.

Dalla riforma del 2024 alla scadenza del

mar9

09/03/2026

Sottrazione fraudolenta: non basta la mera costituzione del fondo patrimoniale

Il giudice deve spiegare perché la segregazione